Is democratic leadership more effective than directive?

I think democratic leadership is better for both leaders and followers. Directive leadership leaves no room for workers to express their views. The boss directs his judgment and leaves no room for discussion. He does not ask for the opinions of others and always decides by himself. Directional guidance can only be useful in a few cases, such as when we need the full attention of others, and any one of the workers cancels it.

Otherwise, the democratic approach is much better. Leader has responsibility not only on his own and can pass much responsibility to others. He allows discussion, takes into account the suggestions and opinions of others. Ultimate decision is made by leader, but he takes into account the opinions of his colleagues. They have room for their own realization and are much more loyal, because they share the result themselves.