Is democratic leadership more effective than directive?

I will always say democratic, but we should keep in mind that it depends on who is part of that democratic process. If the leader is competent, knows right moves and works for public interest, there should be no problem with directive leadership. Democratic leadership doesn't have to be always constructive due to many people has different goals and intentions regarding what should society look like. They can be more self-servant caring only about themselves and not be into public interest that much.

So, I would say that democratic leadership is more effective because of communication that always enhances chances to do things better way, but not always. Sometimes it can be other way around.