Quality of civil society leadership in Croatia compared to Western Europe or the US/Canada?

Civil society leadership in Croatia compared to Western Europe or US/Canada and its quality is lower for sure. If we look at USA, its main advantage are possibilities which that country offers, there are so many job opportunities and ways to earn money, while Croatia is in large debts, and many people's bank accounts are frozen or in deficit. Western Europe countries such as Germany are investing in their economy and they do it succesfully because they have competent leaders that are confident and skillful at what they do. Leadership in Croatia is opposite, their solution is to lower the amount of domestic debt in a way which include selling our country's capital instead of investing in tourism and agriculture, branches in which our country has potential to grow and be very successful. I feel like other country's leadership is based on long-term prosperity and welfare, while ours is here jus to ''survive'', and that is the main problem.